Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

Patricia Graciano
May 1, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) regulates what kind of processing is permitted that involves “special categories of data,” which includes race, origin, religious belief, and health data, among others. As an EU regulation, the GDPR has immediate effect in all member states without requiring any national implementation. This ensures that a certain harmony exists across the EU in terms of data processing to break down barriers for international data flow and to facilitate privacy compliance by multinational companies.

Yet, when it comes to these special categories of data, member states are granted some flexibility to tailor certain provisions. The motivation here is to give effect to cultural and social differences regarding the treatment of sensitive issues relating to the special categories of data.

Germany, with its longstanding commitment to data protection, has utilized the flexibility offered by Article 9 of the GDPR to strengthen and specify conditions under which special categories of data can be processed.

In this article, we will explore how Germany's Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG) aligns with, and expands upon, the GDPR's stipulations. In addition to expanding on the permitted uses of special categories of data, § 22(2) of the BDSG mandates a set of specific rigorous measures designed to ensure the utmost protection of special categories of data.

Permitted Uses under GDPR and BDSGThe following table sets out the circumstances under which the processing of special categories of data are permitted under Art. 9(2) GDPR and the additional or specified permissions under § 22(1) and other provisions of the BDSG.

Permitted Uses under GDPR and BDSG by Patrícia GI

In summary, the German deviations from the GDPR in the context of processing of special categories of data are more in the realm of nuances, which can of course matter significantly. For example, the public interest exception can only be relied upon by public bodies, unless the processing is “absolutely” necessary, introducing a higher threshold for private organizations. In addition, where the processing is generally permitted by public bodies, the interests of the data subject must not outweigh the interest in processing the data.

Overall, there is no net new processing purpose introduced under the BDSG, but rather more concrete and stricter conditions are implemented to safeguard special categories of data.

Additional Safeguard Required under BDSG

Many of the provisions under the GDPR require member states to implement appropriate safeguards as a condition for the exception to the prohibition of processing special categories of data to apply. Germany has done so in § 22(2) of the BDSG, which stipulates a mandatory framework of safeguards that must be instituted whenever special categories of personal data are processed under the exceptions provided by the law. These measures are not optional but are requisite conditions that underpin the legitimacy of the processing activities. The list of mandated measures includes:

  • Technical and organizational measures to ensure GDPR compliance.
  • Mechanisms for auditing whether, how, and by whom personal data have been accessed, modified, or deleted.
  • Education and sensitization programs for all personnel involved in data processing operations.
  • The mandatory appointment of a data protection officer to oversee data processing practices.
  • Access restrictions to personal data within the responsible entity to prevent unauthorized use.
  • The pseudonymization of personal data to obscure identities.
  • The encryption of personal data to protect against unauthorized access or breaches.
  • Measures to ensure the resilience of processing systems and the ability to restore access to personal data swiftly after a physical or technical incident.
  • Regular procedures for testing, evaluating, and assessing the efficacy of all technical and organizational measures.
  • Specific procedural protocols to ensure that data transfers or processing for different purposes remain compliant with both the BDSG and the GDPR.

Through these measures, the BDSG ensures that the processing of special categories of data, while necessary for certain specified purposes, does not compromise the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individuals concerned.

How Private AI Can Help

Private AI’s technology is well equipped to help organizations with compliance with the BDSG, in particularly with §22(2). Among the listed safeguards, pseudonymization falls most obviously into Private AI’s area of expertise. Using the latest advancements in Machine Learning, Private AI can identify and replace over 50 entities of personal data to facilitate compliance. This is possible in 52 languages, which makes the tool perfect for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions, processing data in many different languages. To see the tech in action, try our web demo, or get an API key to try it yourself on your own data.

In summary, the German deviations from the GDPR in the context of processing of special categories of data are more in the realm of nuances, which can of course matter significantly. For example, the public interest exception can only be relied upon by public bodies, unless the processing is “absolutely” necessary, introducing a higher threshold for private organizations. In addition, where the processing is generally permitted by public bodies, the interests of the data subject must not outweigh the interest in processing the data.

Overall, there is no net new processing purpose introduced under the BDSG, but rather more concrete and stricter conditions are implemented to safeguard special categories of data.

Additional Safeguard Required under BDSG

Many of the provisions under the GDPR require member states to implement appropriate safeguards as a condition for the exception to the prohibition of processing special categories of data to apply. Germany has done so in § 22(2) of the BDSG, which stipulates a mandatory framework of safeguards that must be instituted whenever special categories of personal data are processed under the exceptions provided by the law. These measures are not optional but are requisite conditions that underpin the legitimacy of the processing activities. The list of mandated measures includes:

  • Technical and organizational measures to ensure GDPR compliance.
  • Mechanisms for auditing whether, how, and by whom personal data have been accessed, modified, or deleted.
  • Education and sensitization programs for all personnel involved in data processing operations.
  • The mandatory appointment of a data protection officer to oversee data processing practices.
  • Access restrictions to personal data within the responsible entity to prevent unauthorized use.
  • The pseudonymization of personal data to obscure identities.
  • The encryption of personal data to protect against unauthorized access or breaches.
  • Measures to ensure the resilience of processing systems and the ability to restore access to personal data swiftly after a physical or technical incident.
  • Regular procedures for testing, evaluating, and assessing the efficacy of all technical and organizational measures.
  • Specific procedural protocols to ensure that data transfers or processing for different purposes remain compliant with both the BDSG and the GDPR.

Through these measures, the BDSG ensures that the processing of special categories of data, while necessary for certain specified purposes, does not compromise the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individuals concerned.

How Private AI Can Help

Private AI’s technology is well equipped to help organizations with compliance with the BDSG, in particularly with §22(2). Among the listed safeguards, pseudonymization falls most obviously into Private AI’s area of expertise. Using the latest advancements in Machine Learning, Private AI can identify and replace over 50 entities of personal data to facilitate compliance. This is possible in 52 languages, which makes the tool perfect for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions, processing data in many different languages. To see the tech in action, try our web demo, or get an API key to try it yourself on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT