Generative AI Impact on Governments (Part 3/3)

Share This Post

How Are Governments Using Generative AI?

Generative AI has found a multitude of use cases across industries. As of now, approximately 70% of companies are either experimenting with or actively implementing Generative AI into their operations. From content generation to data analysis and customer service automation, this technology is being harnessed to streamline processes and enhance productivity. Of course, the public sector is no different. 

In the realm of content creation, Generative AI has the potential to revolutionize the way we produce text. Latanya Sweeney, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, predicts that in the future, a substantial portion of internet content—up to 90%—will be generated by AI-powered bots.

As for government use, Generative AI can also help create a more efficient, productive, and rewarding work environment for public sector employees. Angie Heise, Corporate Vice President, Microsoft Worldwide Public Sector, lists a few key ways in which Generative AI can be used in the public sector:

  • Citizen Services: Generative AI can act as an “Information Assistant” and answer common questions, recommend services based on inputs, and handle simple transactions. This technology enables chatbots to respond to a wide range of inquiries, improving accessibility for citizens and increasing government efficiency.
  •  
  • Internal Efficiency: AI can help public sector workers by providing intuitive search and chat interactions with intranets and public sector materials. This streamlines onboarding for new employees, promotes efficiency across different departments, and reduces administrative tasks, allowing staff to focus on their mission priorities.
  •  
  • Deep Data: Large Language Models can analyze vast amounts of data and discover connections between topics and domains that may have been overlooked. They can generate insightful summaries of media coverage and public feedback quickly, challenging conventional wisdom and providing a more comprehensive perspective.
  •  
  • Creative Aid: Generative AI can assist in various writing tasks, such as drafting abstracts, speeches, memos, and citizen guides. While human oversight is crucial for accuracy and the human touch, AI can accelerate the writing process and inspire creativity, reducing time-to-completion for common writing tasks.

Generative AI is able to accelerate product development by offering both public and private sector entities a competitive edge. It enhances the customer and civilian experience through personalized interactions and recommendations. 

However, the adoption of Generative AI is not without its concerns. As we already covered in the first part of this series, the technology can produce inaccurate or biased outputs, necessitating human validation. Malicious actors are using it to create “deep fakes” and scams. Additionally, These models’ unpredictability makes oversight and accountability challenging

As Heise puts it: “Now is the time for public sector organizations to begin leveraging and adopting generative AI capabilities, and they can and should do so from a position of engagement and experimentation.”

The pros and cons of Generative AI in the Public Sector
 

As much as the use cases seem promising, we need to look at the bigger picture before implementing any AI tool. Microsoft’s Angie Heise takes a step back to analyze the benefits and the potential setbacks of using Generative AI in the public sector. Some of the benefits include:

  • Force Multiplier for Overworked Staff: Simply put, Generative AI saves time. This technology will be able to help social workers maintain more frequent contact with their caseloads, facilitate enhanced support for academic tutoring, and combat isolation by keeping aging populations active. Generative AI interfaces will be able to free up employees to focus on complex cases.
  •  
  • Increased Capacity at Low Cost: Public sector budgets are often constrained, limiting the scope and speed of services. AI enables governments to expand their capacity without significant additional expenses. These AI assistants complement, rather than replace, public servants, offering a cost-effective means to enhance service quality and responsiveness.
  •  
  • Streamlined Navigation of Government Services: The complexity of government services can be daunting for citizens who infrequently interact with them. Generative AI can guide individuals and businesses through the intricacies of government laws and regulations.
  •  
  • Enhanced Accessibility: AI’s universal translation capabilities break down language barriers, making information accessible to people regardless of their language preferences. Natural language interfaces, both written and spoken, provide intuitive access to government information and services. This ensures that technology is inclusive and accessible to all members of society.
  •  
  • Public-Private Collaboration: Generative AI drives collaboration between the public and private sectors. Public organizations traditionally maintained separate infrastructures, but AI benefits from diversity and shared resources. Collaboration becomes imperative to avoid duplication of efforts and wasteful resource allocation. 

However, Generative AI’s growth does not come without controversy. Privacy concerns have been a major concern, and in June 2023, a class-action lawsuit against Open AI for allegedly stealing “massive amounts of personal data” to train ChatGPT. As such, major companies have either restricted or outright banned employee access to the Generative AI tool. Telecommunications giant Verizon has blocked ChatGPT from their systems in an effort to avoid “losing control of customer information.” After the discovery of an accidental data leak of source code uploaded to ChatGPR, Samsung was also among the companies that outright banned the use of the tool. 

The same privacy and security concerns are also significant in the public sector. Handling sensitive citizen data and interactions necessitates stringent safeguards to prevent breaches and misuse of information. Some other challenges include:

  • Ethical Dilemmas: As AI systems become more capable, ethical dilemmas emerge. Decisions made by AI, even when assisting public servants, can have profound implications. Ensuring AI systems make unbiased and ethical choices is a constant challenge.
  •  
  • Dependency on Technology: The increasing reliance on generative AI could lead to a dependency on technology. If not properly managed, this dependence may erode human skills and judgment, making it challenging to revert to traditional methods when necessary.
  •  
  • Equity and Accessibility Issues: While generative AI has the potential to enhance accessibility, it also poses equity concerns. Not everyone has equal access to technology, potentially leaving vulnerable populations at a disadvantage.

As we embrace the AI revolution, it is imperative that we prioritize responsible development and deployment to harness its benefits while mitigating potential risks.

 

How people feel about Generative AI

For workers and employers, Generative AI presents a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges. According to Pew Research Center, 52% of workers in the professional, scientific, and technical services sector are highly exposed to AI tools like ChatGPT – more than double the average of all workers. However, despite increased exposure, many workers in AI-exposed industries do not necessarily feel their jobs are at risk.
 
The same research found that only 15% of U.S. adults believe that AI will hurt more than help them personally over the next two decades. Workers in the information and technology sector were notably more optimistic, with 32% believing that AI would primarily help them. This suggests that while AI poses certain uncertainties, it also offers opportunities for workers to adapt and thrive in the changing landscape.
 
Nevertheless, addressing concerns about transparency, accuracy, bias, privacy, cybersecurity, and sustainability remains crucial – particularly in adoption by governments. As Generative AI continues to evolve and integrate into our daily lives, responsible use, compliance, and ethical considerations will be at the forefront of discussions. It is imperative to monitor regulatory developments and litigation as countries worldwide shape their regulatory environments for this transformative technology. Ultimately, the full impact of Generative AI on workers, employers and citizens will depend on how these challenges are met and opportunities harnessed in the coming years.

“AI in Government” series, in partnership with Microsoft Canada.

Part I: Navigating the Future of AI: Responsibility, Regulation, and Generative AI Impact

Part II: AI in Government: The fine balance between applying and regulating AI

Part III: Generative AI Impact on Governments
 

Additional resources:

Read Angela Heise’s full blog on Generative AI and Public Sector.

Learn how AI can support Government Services.

Read our blog post on Addressing Privacy and the GDPR in ChatGPT

Try PrivateGPT for free today.

Get Private AI on Azure Marketplace.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Sign up for Private AI’s mailing list to stay up to date with more fresh content, upcoming events, company news, and more! 

More To Explore

Privacy Management
Blog

End-to-end Privacy Management

End-to-end privacy management refers to the process of protecting sensitive data throughout its entire lifecycle, from the moment it is collected to the point where

Read More »

Download the Free Report

Request an API Key

Fill out the form below and we’ll send you a free API key for 500 calls (approx. 50k words). No commitment, no credit card required!

Language Packs

Expand the categories below to see which languages are included within each language pack.
Note: English capabilities are automatically included within the Enterprise pricing tier. 

French
Spanish
Portuguese

Arabic
Hebrew
Persian (Farsi)
Swahili

French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Ukrainian
Belarusian
Bulgarian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
Greek
Hungarian
Icelandic
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Polish
Romanian
Slovak
Slovenian
Swedish
Turkish

Hindi
Korean
Tagalog
Bengali
Burmese
Indonesian
Khmer
Japanese
Malay
Moldovan
Norwegian (Bokmål)
Punjabi
Tamil
Thai
Vietnamese
Mandarin (simplified)

Arabic
Belarusian
Bengali
Bulgarian
Burmese
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
French
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Khmer
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Malay
Mandarin (simplified)
Moldovan
Norwegian (Bokmål)
Persian (Farsi)
Polish
Portuguese
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Tagalog
Tamil
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese

Rappel

Testé sur un ensemble de données composé de données conversationnelles désordonnées contenant des informations de santé sensibles. Téléchargez notre livre blanc pour plus de détails, ainsi que nos performances en termes d’exactitude et de score F1, ou contactez-nous pour obtenir une copie du code d’évaluation.

99.5%+ Accuracy

Number quoted is the number of PII words missed as a fraction of total number of words. Computed on a 268 thousand word internal test dataset, comprising data from over 50 different sources, including web scrapes, emails and ASR transcripts.

Please contact us for a copy of the code used to compute these metrics, try it yourself here, or download our whitepaper.