Law25 and Cookies: Navigating Digital Consent in Quebec

Share This Post

The world of digital privacy is ever-evolving, and Quebec’s Law25 (originating from Bill 64) has positioned itself at the forefront of this change in Canada. One area that’s been impacted significantly by this legislation is the use of cookies and similar tracking technologies on websites. With the relevant provisions coming into effect on September 22, 2023, it is high time to look at the significant changes you may have to make to how you are presenting cookie banners and operationalizing consent requirements.

Explicit Consent:
 

Law25 contains 2 provisions relevant to the use of cookies. Section 8.1 which says that profiling, identification, and locating technology must be turned off by default, and section 9.1, according to which an exemption applies to browser cookies from the requirement that a technological product’s privacy setting must be set to the highest level of confidentiality by default.

  • 8.1 In addition to the information that must be provided in accordance with section 8, any person who collects personal information from the person concerned using technology that includes functions allowing the person concerned to be identified, located or profiled must first inform the person
  •  
  •                    (1) of the use of such technology; and
  •                    (2) of the means available to activate the functions that allow a person to be identified, located or profiled.
  •  
  • “Profiling” means the collection and use of personal information to assess certain characteristics of a natural person, in particular for the purpose of analyzing that person’s work performance, economic situation, health, personal preferences, interests or behaviour.

And

  • 9.1 Any person carrying on an enterprise who collects personal information when offering to the public a technological product or service having privacy settings must ensure that those settings provide the highest level of confidentiality by default, without any intervention by the person concerned.
  •  
  • The first paragraph does not apply to privacy settings for browser cookies.

Section 8.1 applies to cookies as cookies fall squarely within the definition of technologies used to profile, identify, or locate website visitors using their personal information. 

The Quebec privacy commissioner has released draft guidelines on valid consent which include the commissioner’s interpretation on section 8.1. Since the law required that, by default, the profiling technology must be turned off, the commissioner reads this as an express consent requirement. In other words, cookies may not be dropped on the device of a website visitor unless express consent is first obtained. Without an exception for necessary cookies, that is, cookies that are placed on the device of an individual upon the loading of the website and that ensure the proper functioning thereof, compliance with this provision, as interpreted by the commissioner, is going to be challenging. For example, the display of a cookie pop-up usually requires the dropping of a cookie, so that the pop-up is not displayed every time an individual visits the website but that the choice the individual made is remembered.

Furthermore, an argument can be made that these two provisions 8.1 and 9.1 are contradictory. While the former requires the cookie technology to be turned off by default, the latter exempts cookies from the maximum privacy by default requirement of technology products with privacy settings. It can thus be expected that upon coming into force of these provisions, the right implementation will be subject to debate.

 Express Consent:
 

If the privacy commissioner’s guidance remains as is, the express consent requirement for the use of cookies constitutes a departure from the implied or passive consent models used in the past. For cookies:

  • Users must be provided clear information about the types of cookies being used, their purposes, and the data they collect.
  •  
  • Consent mechanisms should be straightforward, allowing users to actively opt-in rather than relying on pre-checked boxes or passive acceptance.
 Essential vs. Non-Essential Cookies:
 

If we were to obtain an exception from the express consent requirement for essential cookies from the Quebec regulator, non-essential cookies, especially those related to advertising or tracking, will likely remain under scrutiny. It would therefore be prudent to make a clear distinction between essential and non-essential cookies and to allow users to reject non-essential cookies without impacting their browsing experience. 

Transparency and Accessibility:

Websites must present their cookie policies and usage in a clear and accessible manner. This means:

  • Having a dedicated cookie policy or a section within the privacy policy that details cookie usage.
  •  
  • Regular updates to the cookie list, ensuring users are aware of any new or removed cookies.

 Data Minimization:

Aligned with Law25’s broader principle of data minimization, cookies should:
 
  • Collect only the necessary data required for their stated purpose. This requires you to also check what information third-party cookies that you use collect.
  •  
  • Limit data retention periods, ensuring that information isn’t stored indefinitely without reason, by you as well as third-party cookies.
 
 
 Third-party Cookies and Data Transfers:
 

Given Law25’s strict stance on data transfers, particularly outside of Quebec:

  • Users should be made aware of any third-party cookies that might transfer data to other jurisdictions.
  •  
  • Sites should ensure that third-party cookie providers adhere to Law25’s principles, especially if data is being transferred out of province or country.
 Cookie Audits and Reviews:
 

To maintain compliance:

  • Organizations should periodically audit their cookie usage, ensuring that all active cookies have been declared and have valid consent mechanisms in place.
  •  
  • Reviews should also ensure that obsolete cookies are removed and that users are informed of any significant changes in cookie usage.

  Right to Withdraw Consent:

Under Law25, users have enhanced rights concerning their data:
 
  • This extends to cookies, where users should have the option to change their cookie preferences or withdraw consent entirely.
  •  
  • Mechanisms should be in place to respect these choices in real time, ensuring that once consent is withdrawn, the tracking ceases immediately.
 Conclusion
 

While cookies are a cornerstone of the modern web, offering personalized user experiences and valuable analytics to website operators, the introduction of Law25 in Quebec means businesses must tread carefully. Balancing functionality with privacy is the new challenge, ensuring that the digital footprints users leave behind are both voluntary and as minimal as necessary. This new era of digital cookie consent, ushered in in Canada by Law25, emphasizes a user-centric approach, empowering individuals to have a say in their online journey.

Get started with PrivateGPT today:

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Sign up for Private AI’s mailing list to stay up to date with more fresh content, upcoming events, company news, and more! 

More To Explore

Blog

End-to-end Privacy Management

End-to-end privacy management refers to the process of protecting sensitive data throughout its entire lifecycle, from the moment it is collected to the point where

Read More »

Download the Free Report

Request an API Key

Fill out the form below and we’ll send you a free API key for 500 calls (approx. 50k words). No commitment, no credit card required!

Language Packs

Expand the categories below to see which languages are included within each language pack.
Note: English capabilities are automatically included within the Enterprise pricing tier. 

French
Spanish
Portuguese

Arabic
Hebrew
Persian (Farsi)
Swahili

French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Ukrainian
Belarusian
Bulgarian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
Greek
Hungarian
Icelandic
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Polish
Romanian
Slovak
Slovenian
Swedish
Turkish

Hindi
Korean
Tagalog
Bengali
Burmese
Indonesian
Khmer
Japanese
Malay
Moldovan
Norwegian (Bokmål)
Punjabi
Tamil
Thai
Vietnamese
Mandarin (simplified)

Arabic
Belarusian
Bengali
Bulgarian
Burmese
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
French
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Khmer
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Malay
Mandarin (simplified)
Moldovan
Norwegian (Bokmål)
Persian (Farsi)
Polish
Portuguese
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Tagalog
Tamil
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese

Rappel

Testé sur un ensemble de données composé de données conversationnelles désordonnées contenant des informations de santé sensibles. Téléchargez notre livre blanc pour plus de détails, ainsi que nos performances en termes d’exactitude et de score F1, ou contactez-nous pour obtenir une copie du code d’évaluation.

99.5%+ Accuracy

Number quoted is the number of PII words missed as a fraction of total number of words. Computed on a 268 thousand word internal test dataset, comprising data from over 50 different sources, including web scrapes, emails and ASR transcripts.

Please contact us for a copy of the code used to compute these metrics, try it yourself here, or download our whitepaper.